First I want to clear up that I am turning my focus away
from law. I will be moving into the publication process and how to get a
manuscript published.
I decided to do my project on the publishing process because
of my experiences this summer working for a literary agency. During my
internship, I was in charge of opening and viewing new submissions from new
authors. I would probably get 30-50 submissions a week but many people would
send their whole manuscript instead of a proposal, or they would mix up writing
a query instead of a proposal, etc… My instructions were to immediately flag
and reject most new submissions that did not come up to the standard of the
company. I felt as if many good authors may have lost their opportunities
because they had no idea about the publishing process. Also through out the
publishing process a writer has to write queries, cover letters, and proposals.
There are many tips and tricks that I know currently, and can further obtain through
my relationship with this literary agency. This information will help new authors. These tips relate to
formatting, grammar, language, diction, and verbal communication. While these
tips will be helpful to know, my project will mostly focus on how to get you
manuscript from the author’s hands and onto the bookshelf.
I think that these are two very good articles for me to
start out with for my project. I think this because they are set up similarly
to my idea. Instead of me going through each topic as a headline, like the
articles I have provided, I want to go through each persons/entity
responsibilities in the publishing process: book, author, editor, agent, and
publisher. I do see myself using a similar format as these articles. I think
having a heading for each entity will be helpful.
Both of these articles seem very vague and not entertaining. I
think that these can be two great examples of how not to introduce my paper. I
think that bringing in my personal experience would be helpful in the
introduction of my paper but then I think it would be better to switch to 2nd
person as I explain the publishing process. These articles give me examples of
2nd person.
In the USA Today
article there are some question directed toward the reader. I believe this is a
technique that I should not use in my paper because I am telling my readers how
to do something.
I think it is very helpful to me, if I find a magazine
article where I can follow the submission guidelines. I want to follow the
submission guidelines for a magazine because both of these articles seem too
small for me to fit my information into. I think that writing a piece about
submission guidelines under the submission guidelines of a magazine is a very
interesting dynamic that can challenge me as a writer. I am currently looking
for the perfect magazine for this piece. I am currently very interested in Readers Digest but I would love any
suggestions. I would do Readers Digest
but I want it to be more directed at college graduating English majors or
recently graduated English majors.
Austin - can't get into your google drive yet - let me know when I can!
ReplyDelete